A discussion on how Jesus Christ validated his divinity and authority through miracles, which serve as proof of his power to remit sins and fulfill prophecy.

The author posits that the existence of many false remedies and impostors actually proves the existence of true remedies, as men would not have the capacity to believe in a possibility that had no basis in reality.

The author posits that the existence of many false miracles and religions actually proves the existence of a true one, as falsehood is typically a parasitic imitation of truth. He argues that people would not be capable of believing in the false if there were no underlying reality of the true.

The author distinguishes between divine temptation and leading into error, arguing that God provides opportunities for choice without forcing a false conclusion, whereas error implies a necessary following of untruth.

The author suggests that the primary function of miracles is not to facilitate the conversion of the unbelieving, but to serve as a basis for their moral condemnation.